<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Present Tenses and State Verbs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/</link>
	<description>Master Grammar and Skills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shizuka		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/#comment-30671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shizuka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=894#comment-30671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Phil,

One definition of a verb is that &quot;verbs express actions of states of being&quot;. While I initially agreed with this definition, it occurred to me that verbs are generally grouped into dynamic verbs (aka action verbs) and stative verbs (aka state verbs), and that stative verbs can be further divided into a few groups, such as sensing verbs (e.g. see, hear, smell etc), emotion &#038; thought verbs (e.g. love, hate or think as well as any other mental cognitive and/or emotional verbs), possession verbs (to have, to belong, to own etc) and finally being verbs (e.g. be/are/is, contain, involve, consist etc).

Firstly, may I know if my above classification of verbs is accurate?

Secondly, if my above classification is accurate, then wouldn&#039;t this imply that the definition i listed above about verbs (i.e. verbs are words which express actions of states of being) somewhat lacking, since &quot;states of being&quot; verbs simply refer to being verbs, which is but one category of stative verbs? In other words, why I say the definition seems to be lacking is because it should have said &quot;verbs are words which express actions or states (i.e. stative verbs)&quot;, thereby covering other types of stative verbs, and not just &quot;states of being verbs (aka being verbs)&quot;? May I know if I am right? 

Regards,
Shizuka]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p>One definition of a verb is that &#8220;verbs express actions of states of being&#8221;. While I initially agreed with this definition, it occurred to me that verbs are generally grouped into dynamic verbs (aka action verbs) and stative verbs (aka state verbs), and that stative verbs can be further divided into a few groups, such as sensing verbs (e.g. see, hear, smell etc), emotion &amp; thought verbs (e.g. love, hate or think as well as any other mental cognitive and/or emotional verbs), possession verbs (to have, to belong, to own etc) and finally being verbs (e.g. be/are/is, contain, involve, consist etc).</p>
<p>Firstly, may I know if my above classification of verbs is accurate?</p>
<p>Secondly, if my above classification is accurate, then wouldn&#8217;t this imply that the definition i listed above about verbs (i.e. verbs are words which express actions of states of being) somewhat lacking, since &#8220;states of being&#8221; verbs simply refer to being verbs, which is but one category of stative verbs? In other words, why I say the definition seems to be lacking is because it should have said &#8220;verbs are words which express actions or states (i.e. stative verbs)&#8221;, thereby covering other types of stative verbs, and not just &#8220;states of being verbs (aka being verbs)&#8221;? May I know if I am right? </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shizuka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Williams		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/#comment-29184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=894#comment-29184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/#comment-29178&quot;&gt;Shizuka&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Shizuka,

I think your understanding there is accurate - I would generally see state as covering a broader sense of condition while situation refers more to a particular time and place. There is some crossover where they could be used synonymously, but to look at some differences, you might use state to refer to emotions while you might use situation to talk about challenges being faced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/#comment-29178" data-wpel-link="internal">Shizuka</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Shizuka,</p>
<p>I think your understanding there is accurate &#8211; I would generally see state as covering a broader sense of condition while situation refers more to a particular time and place. There is some crossover where they could be used synonymously, but to look at some differences, you might use state to refer to emotions while you might use situation to talk about challenges being faced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shizuka		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/present-tenses-state-verbs/#comment-29178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shizuka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2020 06:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=894#comment-29178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Phil,

Not sure if this is entirely relevant to this article, but may I know what the difference is between the word &quot;state&quot; and the word &quot;situation&quot;. Dictionaries appear to list these two words as synonyms of each other, but my understanding of both words is that for &quot;state&quot; it reflects the current condition that a person/thing is in (that is focus is on the person/thing itself), but &quot;situation&quot; refers to the factors/conditions that exist at a particular time/place (that is focus is on the factors/surrounding of the person/thing as oppose to the person/thing itself). Is this correct?

Regards,
Shizuka]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Phil,</p>
<p>Not sure if this is entirely relevant to this article, but may I know what the difference is between the word &#8220;state&#8221; and the word &#8220;situation&#8221;. Dictionaries appear to list these two words as synonyms of each other, but my understanding of both words is that for &#8220;state&#8221; it reflects the current condition that a person/thing is in (that is focus is on the person/thing itself), but &#8220;situation&#8221; refers to the factors/conditions that exist at a particular time/place (that is focus is on the factors/surrounding of the person/thing as oppose to the person/thing itself). Is this correct?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shizuka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
