<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Phrasal Verbs Using &#8220;to be&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/</link>
	<description>Master Grammar and Skills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Williams		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4774#comment-29773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29769&quot;&gt;Shizuka&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Shizuka,

Good question – yes, that is the infinitive, and I think the simplest answer to its use is that when we use the infinitive we are very clearly referring to the verb as a grammatical unit. It works somewhat like a name, identifying the verb. There is probably a more philosophical answer to this, though, in that the &#039;to&#039; makes it clear we are considering the verb in for its function.

In practice, though, for the most part, it&#039;s unlikely to cause problems using one format or another (infinitive or bare infinitive) to discuss the verb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29769" data-wpel-link="internal">Shizuka</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Shizuka,</p>
<p>Good question – yes, that is the infinitive, and I think the simplest answer to its use is that when we use the infinitive we are very clearly referring to the verb as a grammatical unit. It works somewhat like a name, identifying the verb. There is probably a more philosophical answer to this, though, in that the &#8216;to&#8217; makes it clear we are considering the verb in for its function.</p>
<p>In practice, though, for the most part, it&#8217;s unlikely to cause problems using one format or another (infinitive or bare infinitive) to discuss the verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shizuka		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shizuka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 12:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4774#comment-29769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Phil,

I have a question that may not be directly related to the main topic of this article, but it&#039;s about the verb &quot;to be&quot;, as well as any other verb in general. My question is why is it that whenever we talk about any verb, we tend to refer to it as a &quot;to + verb&quot; format, e.g. &quot;to be&quot;, &quot;to run&quot;, &quot;to sleep&quot; and so on/so forth. 

Firstly, such a format is referred to as the infinitive form of a verb, correct?

Secondly, is there any significance in referring to verbs via their infinitive form (i.e. to + &quot;verb&quot;)? Why can&#039;t we just refer to a verb by its base form (be, run, sleep etc)?

Many thanks!

Regards,
Shizuka]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p>I have a question that may not be directly related to the main topic of this article, but it&#8217;s about the verb &#8220;to be&#8221;, as well as any other verb in general. My question is why is it that whenever we talk about any verb, we tend to refer to it as a &#8220;to + verb&#8221; format, e.g. &#8220;to be&#8221;, &#8220;to run&#8221;, &#8220;to sleep&#8221; and so on/so forth. </p>
<p>Firstly, such a format is referred to as the infinitive form of a verb, correct?</p>
<p>Secondly, is there any significance in referring to verbs via their infinitive form (i.e. to + &#8220;verb&#8221;)? Why can&#8217;t we just refer to a verb by its base form (be, run, sleep etc)?</p>
<p>Many thanks!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shizuka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ELB Phrasal Verbs Master List: Grammar, Definitions and Examples for 140+ Verbs - English Lessons Brighton		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELB Phrasal Verbs Master List: Grammar, Definitions and Examples for 140+ Verbs - English Lessons Brighton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4774#comment-29443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] be [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Williams		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4774#comment-29032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29031&quot;&gt;Vlastimil Čech&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Vlastimil,

Yes they are quite tricky to get the hang of, being so specific to the context, but you are correct in your interpretation - in the first &quot;I&#039;m in!&quot; is the enthusiastic agreement to the plans, while in the second &quot;they are in for £50&quot; is a commitment to spend that money. The second example could perhaps be a little clearer, something like:
&lt;ul&gt;The investors believe in the new development and are in for a million pounds.&lt;/ul&gt;
This could also be used for non-monetary commitments, such as time-based concepts.
&lt;ul&gt;The investors believe in the new development and are in for the long haul.&lt;/ul&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29031" data-wpel-link="internal">Vlastimil Čech</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Vlastimil,</p>
<p>Yes they are quite tricky to get the hang of, being so specific to the context, but you are correct in your interpretation &#8211; in the first &#8220;I&#8217;m in!&#8221; is the enthusiastic agreement to the plans, while in the second &#8220;they are in for £50&#8221; is a commitment to spend that money. The second example could perhaps be a little clearer, something like:</p>
<ul>The investors believe in the new development and are in for a million pounds.</ul>
<p>This could also be used for non-monetary commitments, such as time-based concepts.</p>
<ul>The investors believe in the new development and are in for the long haul.</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vlastimil Čech		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/phrasal-verbs-to-be/#comment-29031</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlastimil Čech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4774#comment-29031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr Williams,
     I would like to ask you to explain this phrasal item:

to be in (2)
To commit to something, such as a plan, project or game. (Note, this could be
used with ‘for’ to quantify the commitment, which is different to the phrasal
verb ‘be in for’ below.)
• Who’s going to the cinema tonight? I’m in!
• Once we explained the scheme, they were all in for fifty pounds each.


I am not sure if I understood both cases properly.
 
1 I would like to emphasise I am free and eager to go to the cinema with the
person who asks the audience.
2 (I am a little bit lost) We introduced our price policy and then we sold
this product - each item for 50 pounds (?)
        Yours faithfully
                              Vlastimil Čech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Williams,<br />
     I would like to ask you to explain this phrasal item:</p>
<p>to be in (2)<br />
To commit to something, such as a plan, project or game. (Note, this could be<br />
used with ‘for’ to quantify the commitment, which is different to the phrasal<br />
verb ‘be in for’ below.)<br />
• Who’s going to the cinema tonight? I’m in!<br />
• Once we explained the scheme, they were all in for fifty pounds each.</p>
<p>I am not sure if I understood both cases properly.</p>
<p>1 I would like to emphasise I am free and eager to go to the cinema with the<br />
person who asks the audience.<br />
2 (I am a little bit lost) We introduced our price policy and then we sold<br />
this product &#8211; each item for 50 pounds (?)<br />
        Yours faithfully<br />
                              Vlastimil Čech</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
