<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Forming Polite Questions and Requests	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/</link>
	<description>Master Grammar and Skills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Williams		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/#comment-29479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4395#comment-29479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/#comment-29465&quot;&gt;Shizuka&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Shizuka,

That&#039;s a very good question - I think you&#039;re absolutely right to look at it that way, referring to them as Object Questions is limiting. It serves a particular purpose, to differentiate between a question that asks about the subject and one that asks about the object, but I don&#039;t believe the two types accurately cover all kinds of questions. I&#039;d typically break questions down more relating to how they are structured, if they are simple yes/no questions or use a question word, or are a tag question, for example, before looking at whether they relate to the subject or other information. Then to differentiate between a subject question or not I would ask if the question word represents the subject or not (i.e. is the subject present in the question):
-Did James open the door? (James did the verb)
-What did James open? (James did the verb)
-Who opened the door? (unknown subject)
The third is clearly a subject question, the second is an object question, but even though the first is clearly not a subject question, it is not asking for an object either - it&#039;s a yes/no question, I would leave it at that. Likewise your questions such as &#039;when&#039; or &#039;where&#039; are unlikely to ask about an object as such, but may also clearly not be subject questions. Essentially, it&#039;s the difference between if we have the subject present in the question or not, and I think you&#039;re finding these other examples are defining &#039;object&#039; questions as any where the subject is known, so we are asking for more information, not for the subject. It&#039;s useful when creating questions to know if it&#039;s a Subject question or not, but trying to differentiate between Object questions and ones asking for other information is probably less useful, I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/#comment-29465" data-wpel-link="internal">Shizuka</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Shizuka,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a very good question &#8211; I think you&#8217;re absolutely right to look at it that way, referring to them as Object Questions is limiting. It serves a particular purpose, to differentiate between a question that asks about the subject and one that asks about the object, but I don&#8217;t believe the two types accurately cover all kinds of questions. I&#8217;d typically break questions down more relating to how they are structured, if they are simple yes/no questions or use a question word, or are a tag question, for example, before looking at whether they relate to the subject or other information. Then to differentiate between a subject question or not I would ask if the question word represents the subject or not (i.e. is the subject present in the question):<br />
-Did James open the door? (James did the verb)<br />
-What did James open? (James did the verb)<br />
-Who opened the door? (unknown subject)<br />
The third is clearly a subject question, the second is an object question, but even though the first is clearly not a subject question, it is not asking for an object either &#8211; it&#8217;s a yes/no question, I would leave it at that. Likewise your questions such as &#8216;when&#8217; or &#8216;where&#8217; are unlikely to ask about an object as such, but may also clearly not be subject questions. Essentially, it&#8217;s the difference between if we have the subject present in the question or not, and I think you&#8217;re finding these other examples are defining &#8216;object&#8217; questions as any where the subject is known, so we are asking for more information, not for the subject. It&#8217;s useful when creating questions to know if it&#8217;s a Subject question or not, but trying to differentiate between Object questions and ones asking for other information is probably less useful, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shizuka		</title>
		<link>https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/forming-polite-questions/#comment-29465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shizuka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 14:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://englishlessonsbrighton.co.uk/?p=4395#comment-29465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Phil,

Concerning  the subject of &quot;questions&quot; in English, I understand that there are two main types, namely Subject questions and object questions.

As the terms imply, object questions are mainly concerned with finding out information about the object of a sentence, while subject questions are concerned with the subject of the sentence.

Simply examples are as follows: 

Sentence: James dropped the glass.

Object question: What did James drop?

Subject question: Who dropped the glass?

However, I&#039;ve also come across the following part of a grammatical text which says that the following are examples of Object questions:

Where do you live?
Did you go shopping yesterday?
When are they going to arrive next week?

Here is my question - shouldn&#039;t the answers to object questions be the objects themselves such as &quot;glass&quot; being the answer to the object question &quot;What did James drop?&quot;? If so, the answers to &quot;Where do you live?&quot; or &quot;Did you go shopping yesterday?&quot;  could be &quot;I live in Japan&quot; and &quot;Yes, I did go shopping yesterday&quot;. Now if that&#039;s the case, &quot;in Japan&quot; isnt a direct object since &quot;live&quot; as In &quot;I live in Japan&quot; is an intransitive verb, and neither is &quot;shopping&quot; the direct object of &quot;I did go shopping yesterday&quot;. If so, how can these be called Object Questions?

Would greatly appreciate your advice, thanks!

Regards,
Shizuka]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p>Concerning  the subject of &#8220;questions&#8221; in English, I understand that there are two main types, namely Subject questions and object questions.</p>
<p>As the terms imply, object questions are mainly concerned with finding out information about the object of a sentence, while subject questions are concerned with the subject of the sentence.</p>
<p>Simply examples are as follows: </p>
<p>Sentence: James dropped the glass.</p>
<p>Object question: What did James drop?</p>
<p>Subject question: Who dropped the glass?</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve also come across the following part of a grammatical text which says that the following are examples of Object questions:</p>
<p>Where do you live?<br />
Did you go shopping yesterday?<br />
When are they going to arrive next week?</p>
<p>Here is my question &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t the answers to object questions be the objects themselves such as &#8220;glass&#8221; being the answer to the object question &#8220;What did James drop?&#8221;? If so, the answers to &#8220;Where do you live?&#8221; or &#8220;Did you go shopping yesterday?&#8221;  could be &#8220;I live in Japan&#8221; and &#8220;Yes, I did go shopping yesterday&#8221;. Now if that&#8217;s the case, &#8220;in Japan&#8221; isnt a direct object since &#8220;live&#8221; as In &#8220;I live in Japan&#8221; is an intransitive verb, and neither is &#8220;shopping&#8221; the direct object of &#8220;I did go shopping yesterday&#8221;. If so, how can these be called Object Questions?</p>
<p>Would greatly appreciate your advice, thanks!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shizuka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
